註冊 登入/註冊 微博

追帖 打印

[世界歷史] American Conspiracies

American Conspiracies

【轉載】What really happened on September 11?

From day one, there was something that puzzled me. You had FOUR airplanes BEING hijacked on the SAME morning. Maybe the first one snuck by the radar -- but the next three? I'd been inside air traffic control, where you've got a dozen people watching every plane in their sector. They know what direction all the aircraft are supposed to be going, and here were FOUR planes going directly OPPOSITE of their normal flight path. BUT we'RE SUPPOSED TO believe that NO alarm bells went off anywhere, so NO fighter jets got scrambled to intercept the planes. Was everybody asleep at the switch? HOW could the FAA and our air defenses experience SUCH a miserable failure ?

American Conspiracies

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

Conspiracies 陰謀;密謀;謀劃

BEING hijacked 被劫持(飛機或車輛)

snuck 偷偷地走,潛行;偷帶,偷拿

be supposed to 被期望,應該,預期

got scrambled (使)(飛機)緊急起飛

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:04 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Between September 2000 and June 2001, on 67 different occasions fighter jets were sent to intercept aircraft that had lost radio contact or their transponder signal or were flying off course, usually within TEN minutes of any sign of a problem. (Contrary to what some people think, presidential approval WASN'T needed to intercept or even shoot down an aircraft.) Then, on June 1, 2001, the existing hijacking response procedures were CHANGED to require approval by the secretary of defense BEFORE responding to a situation with lethal force. And when the call came into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, NOBODY answered the phone !

American Conspiracies

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


hijack 劫持(飛機或車輛)

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:05 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Now let's look at whether it was actually those two planes that were responsible for the falling towers. I was amazed, watching the 2007 version of the documentary Loose Change (which I urge everyone to see), at the many firefighters and other eyewitnesses who talked about a whole series of explosions before and during the collapse of the buildings. All of this was reported on the news at the time. Before the South Tower collapsed, video footage clearly shows sizable amounts of white smoke starting to pour out of the base. There was described a "giant rolling ball of flame" that came up from street level; an elevator that exploded on the 65th floor as someone stood beside it; a woman on the 49th floor seeing people with burns and broken arms in the stairwells. "For every window in the lobby to be exploding ... it WASN'T from the jet fuel, no way," according to one of the witnesses. And a whole lot more that did NOT jive with any plane striking the building. Mr Barry Jennings, the city's emergency coordinator, was at the scene before and after the building collapses. Mr Jennings puts it out there plainly: "I know what I heard. I heard explosions."

American Conspiracies

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

documentary (電影或電視)紀錄片;紀實性廣播節目

sizable amounts

stairwells (建築物內的)樓梯井

lobby 大堂,大廳,門廳

jive with sth 與…一致,與…相符

plainly 明顯地

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-8-5 04:15 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】For my TV show, I interviewed a witness named Mr William Rodriguez, a janitor who happened to have a master key and rescued many people and got honored as a national hero. He says that shortly before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower at 8:46 AM, an explosion simultaneously rocked the building so hard "it pushed us up." Mr Rodriguez later testified behind closed doors to the 9/11 Commission, but his name was NEVER mentioned in the report. Mr Rodriguez also gave the commission and the FBI a list of FOURTEEN people who'd been with him, but NOT a single one was ever contacted. He produced his boss for us, who looked me right in the eye and in essence told me the same story. What's happened to Mr Rodriguez today? He's on the no-fly list. Mr Rodriguez is one who went back in to save people, with no regard for his own life ! When Mr Rodriguez goes somewhere, he's pulled out of the line, interrogated, harassed. All because, I guess, Mr Rodriguez DIDN'T give the "proper testimony" BUSH wanted.

Author: Mr
Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

(學校或大樓的) 看門人,門房,管理員

testified (尤指在法庭上) 作證

in essence 實質上

no-fly 禁飛

harassed 被騷擾

testimony (法庭上的) 證詞

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:07 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had FOUR engines) would NOT cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit sorry/11 were going 440 and 550 miles an hour.

KEEP in MIND that NO other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a CONTROLLED demolition from INSIDE the buildings? ... I DID work four years as part of the navy's underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a PROMINENT physicist, Professor Steven E. Jones, who says that a "gravity driven collapse" without demolition charges DEFIES the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately TEN seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there's the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds GOT tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.

Professor Mr Steven E. Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel COULDN'T have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9/11, with Governor Mr Pataki and my wife, Ms Terry. It didn't mean anything to me at the time, BUT they had to SUSPEND digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of HUGE temperatures. These fires kept burning for MORE than THREE months, the LONGEST-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We're talking molten metal MORE than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

skyscraper 摩天大樓

demolition 拆除,拆毀

DEFIES 對抗;違抗;反抗

free-fall (重力作用下的)自由下落,自由落體運動

beams (尤指支撐建築物或其他結構的)樑,桁架,棟樑

Got tossed 被(隨意地)扔,擲,拋

laterally: towards the side

SUSPEND 停止,暫停,中止

blaze 大火,烈火

Fahrenheit 華氏溫標(冰點為32度,沸點為212度)

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:08 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal, in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/ explosive. Here's what the paper's lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he's convinced brought down the Twin Towers and the nearby Building 7:

"Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust-powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel."

Mr Richard Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: "Once you get to the science, it's indisputable."

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota



nano- 極微小的

thermite 熱鋁

incendiary 燃燒彈

rust- 鏽的;鐵鏽的

Centigrade 攝氏溫度

welding 焊接,鍛接

additives 添加劑,添加物

dynamite 黃色炸藥,達納炸藥,甘油炸藥

structural engineers 房產檢視員;房屋鑒定人

put/ lay sth on the line 使…冒風險

anomalies 異常的人(或事物);不規則;(同一種類中的)畸形

implications 含意;暗指,暗示

bluntly 直言不諱

indisputable 不容置疑的,無可爭辯的

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:09 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】So what happened to the steel debris form the World Trade Center that might have backed this up? Well, for the MOST part it was shipped overseas. The removal of four companies contracted by the city was carefully controlled and monitored. The building assessment performance team WASN'T allowed to take samples. One firefighter I spoke with, who got dug out of the rubble sorry/ 11, said: "The ONE thing that always troubled me is, why were they (BUSH) in SUCH a hurry to REMOVE all the evidence? Why did they (BUSH) TAKE AWAY everything from the site as fast and expediently as possible?"

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

debris 碎片,殘駭

back sth up 證明,證實

assessment 評估;估價;評估結果

(got) dig sb/sth out (被) 把…弄出;把…扒出來;把…挖出來

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-8-5 04:17 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】A few hours BEFORE the attack, for some reason Building 7's alarm system went on test status. The power was shut off and all tenants evacuated after the second plane hit. People were REPORTING major fires on the east, north, and west faces that covered about six of the floors. One witness, Mr Michael Hess, reported a MAJOR explosion on the SIXTH floor and being trapped for 90 minutes two floors above that, until he was rescued by the fire department.

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:11 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Well, just like the Twin Towers, the 47-story Building 7 fell symmetrically into its own footprint (in 6.5 seconds), sending the SAME type of pyro-plastic cloud down the surrounding streets that demolition is known to cause . KEEP in MIND that other nearby buildings with much worse damage NEVER collapsed. NOT Building 3, which was split in half by the South Tower's debris. NOT Building 4, otherwise almost completely destroyed. NOT Buildings 5 or 6, which suffered severe fires and structure damage. And they were much smaller than Building 7, where 81 columns all had to collapse at the SAME time due to fires on JUST a few floors. So WHY did Building 7 come down as it did? WHAT'S being covered up?

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


(being) covered sth up (被)掩蓋;掩飾;隱瞞

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:11 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】I've got questions about the attack on the Pentagon also. Getting back to Mr Charles Lewis and what he heard that morning on the walkie-talkies out at LAX: The security guards referred to a "missile" having hit the Pentagon. "I was kinda puzzled," Mr Lewis says, "because by the time the airport had been evacuated and I got home, the missile that had hit the Pentagon had MYSTERIOUSLY changed to being another plane. I couldn't figure that out, because I didn't take the FBI or the LA World Airport Police to be putting on a pageant for me."

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


pageant 華麗的展示;盛大的慶典

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:12 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Of course, officially it was American Airlines Flight 77 that crashed into the ground floor at 9:37 AM. Only a section of the Pentagon that had been reinforced to withstand a terrorist attack was hit. Anywhere else, the damage and the casualties would have been much worse. Left behind by a plane 100-some feet wide was a hole 16 feet deep, but no evidence to accompany it, which is something that a former air force fighter pilot says he'd never seen happen. The fighter pilot also says that jet engines do not leave a trail of white smoke, as was seen at the Pentagon. "We don't know what it was , but you can tell what it wasn't," according to the fighter pilot. And he believes it WASN'T a 757 aircraft.

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:12 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

轉載Another doubter is a retired Commanding General of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, who was responsible for the army's strategic intelligence sources worldwide. "I have had a lot of experience looking at photographs," the General says. "I don't know exactly what hit the Pentagon, but I do know from the photographs I have analyzed, it was not an airplane. For one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the side (of the building). One person counteracted my theory and said, 'Oh, you've got it all wrong, the airplane came across, one wing hit the ground and broke off.' Which is possible, but if I understand airplanes correctly, most of them have two wings. So there should have been a mark for the second one." The General also believes the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition.

"How could a Boeing 757, with its engines extending beneath its wings, have struck the Pentagon so low without damaging the lawn and destroying the lawn and destroying the large cable spools on the ground in front of the damaged area?" asks an 9/11 expert, a California professor and the author of eight books exploring the contradictions of the official 9/11 story. He also cites the observation of an air force lieutenant colonel then employed at the Pentagon, who saw "NO airplane metal or cargo debris."

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


controlled demolition 控制拆毀

lawn (尤指房屋附近或公園的)草地,草坪

spools (線、金屬絲、膠片等的)捲軸,捲盤

air force lieutenant colonel 空軍中校

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-27 04:46 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP


回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Here's what troubled me: the law was immediately and completely broken there. They had military personnel out on the lawn cleaning everything up, before an investigator ever arrived. Those hasty cleanups now seem to be Standard Operating Procedure when it comes to assassinations and events like 9/11, don't they. Whenever there's a plane crash, things are strewn about. So where are the seats, the luggage? The wings, vertical stabilizers, and engines were never fully recovered. A number of parts to a 757 are pretty much indestructible, but not a single piece has ever been positively identified as originating with Flight 77. The Department of Justice has admitted to having 85 videos, but they've refused a Freedom of Information Act request to release them.

Another expert we communicated with is Colonel George Nelson, who during 30 years of commissioned service in the air force served as an aircraft accident investigation board member. Colonel Nelson says: "With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could ONLY conclude that a Boeing 757 did NOT fly into the Pentagon  as alleged ... In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I NEVER witnessed NOR even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident."

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota


assassinations 暗殺(名人或重要人物)

be strewn (被) 撒,散佈;(在…上)布滿,撒滿

stabilizers(飛機的)水準尾翼;(船隻的)減搖裝置 ;(車輛的)穩定裝置

indestructible 不可毀滅的;破壞不了的

Freedom of Information Act 資訊自由法


commission 委任 (或任命) ...為軍官

board member 董事會成員

crash 撞車事故;失事

wreckage 嚴重受損的東西;殘骸

accessible 可進入的,可接近的;可得到的

registration number(機動車輛的)牌照號碼,登記號碼

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:14 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

【轉載】Then there's the background on the pilot. His name was Mr Charles "Chic" Burlingame, and he was not only well-schooled in martial arts, but a retired Top Gun pilot, the best of the best. ALL his friends said there's NO way he'd give up his plane, it wasn't in the man's makeup. Unless the hijackers got to him and killed him -- but with box cutters? Supposedly, a hijacker named Hanjour got control of the plane. Except, later, his flight instructor described Hanjour as barely being able to handle a single-engine Cessna a month earlier. And Flight 77 is said to have made a complicated 330-degree turn, dropping 7,000 feet, executing a maneuver that experienced pilots say is nearly impossible.

Author: Mr Jesse Ventura, the 38th Governor of Minnesota

be well-schooled in ...
受到良好的 ... 教育

Supposedly 想像上;大概;恐怕

executing (尤指有計劃地)實施,履行,表演

maneuver 精巧動作

[ 本帖最後由 智安 於 2017-7-20 02:14 PM 編輯 ]

回覆 引用 TOP

 34 123
 提示:支持鍵盤翻頁 ←左 右→ 發新話題發佈投票